Bearing capacity is the maximum load per unit area that a soil can support without shear failure. It is the fundamental output of any foundation design process. Every building, bridge, dam, and retaining wall begins with the question: what is the safe bearing capacity of this soil? This guide covers the theoretical framework, IS 6403:1981 provisions, and practical application.
Types of Bearing Capacity
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Gross Ultimate Bearing Capacity (qult) | Maximum load per unit area before shear failure; includes weight of soil above foundation |
| Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity (qnet,ult) | qult – γDf (subtracts overburden pressure at foundation level) |
| Net Safe Bearing Capacity (qnet,s) | qnet,ult / FOS (typically FOS = 3) |
| Net Allowable Bearing Pressure (qa) | Lesser of qnet,s and allowable settlement-based pressure |
| Safe Bearing Capacity (qs) | qnet,s + γDf (adds back overburden) |
Types of Shear Failure
- General shear failure: Dense sand, stiff clay; well-defined failure surface reaching ground level; sudden, brittle failure — Terzaghi's theory applies directly
- Local shear failure: Loose sand, soft clay (relative density 20–65%); failure surface doesn't reach ground level; gradual settlement without dramatic failure
- Punching shear failure: Very loose sand, very soft clay; soil compresses under footing; no distinct failure surface; only vertical movement
Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Equation (1943)
For a strip footing (L/B → ∞) on general shear failure:
qult = c × Nc + q × Nq + 0.5 × γ × B × Nγ
Where:
c = cohesion of soil (kN/m²)
q = overburden pressure at foundation level = γ × Df
γ = unit weight of soil below foundation (kN/m³)
B = foundation width (m)
Nc, Nq, Nγ = dimensionless bearing capacity factors (function of φ)
Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Factors:
| φ (°) | Nc | Nq | Nγ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5.7 | 1.0 | 0 |
| 10 | 9.6 | 2.7 | 1.2 |
| 20 | 17.7 | 7.4 | 5.0 |
| 25 | 25.1 | 12.7 | 9.7 |
| 30 | 37.2 | 22.5 | 19.7 |
| 35 | 57.8 | 41.4 | 42.9 |
| 40 | 95.7 | 81.3 | 100.4 |
Shape Factors for Rectangular and Circular Footings:
| Footing Shape | qult Formula |
|---|---|
| Strip (B/L → 0) | c·Nc + q·Nq + 0.5γBNγ |
| Square (B = L) | 1.3c·Nc + q·Nq + 0.4γBNγ |
| Circular (dia = B) | 1.3c·Nc + q·Nq + 0.3γBNγ |
| Rectangular | (1+0.3B/L)c·Nc + q·Nq + 0.5(1-0.2B/L)γBNγ |
IS 6403:1981 — Code of Practice for Determination of Bearing Capacity
IS 6403:1981 adopts Meyerhof's general bearing capacity equation with correction factors for shape, depth, inclination, and ground slope:
qult = c·Nc·sc·dc·ic + q·Nq·sq·dq·iq + 0.5·γ·B·Nγ·sγ·dγ·iγ
Where s = shape factor, d = depth factor, i = inclination factor.
IS 6403 Depth Factors (Meyerhof):
dc = 1 + 0.2·(Df/B)·Kφ
dq = dγ = 1 + 0.1·(Df/B)·Kφ for φ ≥ 10°
dq = dγ = 1 for φ = 0°
Kφ = tan(45 + φ/2)
Effect of Water Table on Bearing Capacity
IS 6403 Clause 5.5 — Groundwater table position critically affects bearing capacity through effective stress:
| GWT Position | Correction |
|---|---|
| GWT at or above foundation level (z = 0) | Use γ' (submerged unit weight) for q and γ terms; qnet reduced significantly |
| GWT at depth z below foundation (0 < z ≤ B) | Use γeffective = γ' + z/B × (γ – γ') for Nγ term only |
| GWT at depth > B below foundation | No correction needed; water table effect negligible |
Rule of thumb: Submerged bearing capacity ≈ 50–60% of dry bearing capacity for the same soil.
Safe Bearing Capacity from Field Tests
From SPT (sandy soils):
qnet,s = Cw × (3.6·N²·B + 5.4·(100 + N²)) kPa [B ≤ 1.2 m, FOS = 3]
From Plate Load Test (IS 1888):
For clay: qf(foundation) = qf(plate) (independent of plate size)
For sand: qf(foundation) = qf(plate) × (Bf/Bp)
Presumptive Bearing Values (IS 1904:1986 Table 1)
For preliminary design only, IS 1904 gives presumptive values:
| Soil Type | Safe Bearing Capacity (kN/m²) |
|---|---|
| Hard rock (granite, basalt) | 3,240–16,000 |
| Medium hard rock (limestone, sandstone) | 1,620–3,240 |
| Soft rock, weathered | 440–1,620 |
| Gravel, sand-gravel (compact) | 440 |
| Coarse to medium sand (dry, dense) | 440 |
| Fine sand, loose medium sand | 245 |
| Stiff hard clay | 440 |
| Soft clay | 100 |
| Very soft clay, black cotton, peat | 50 or less |
Worked Example
Problem: Square footing, B = 1.5 m, Df = 1.2 m, on sand with φ = 30°, c = 0, γ = 18 kN/m³. Find net SBC.
Step 1: Nc = 37.2, Nq = 22.5, Nγ = 19.7 (from Terzaghi's table, φ = 30°)
Step 2: Square footing: qult = 0 + 1.0×(18×1.2)×22.5 + 0.4×18×1.5×19.7
= 21.6×22.5 + 0.4×18×1.5×19.7 = 486 + 212.8 = 698.8 kN/m²
Step 3: qnet,ult = 698.8 – 18×1.2 = 698.8 – 21.6 = 677.2 kN/m²
Step 4: qnet,s = 677.2/3 = 225.7 kN/m²
Step 5: Also check settlement — if settlement criterion gives a lower value, that governs.
Frequently Asked Questions
What FOS is used for bearing capacity in India?
IS 6403:1981 recommends FOS = 3 for shear failure when calculations are based on field tests (SPT, PLT) with limited data. FOS = 2.5 when plate load tests or adequate field tests are available. IS 1904:1986 also allows FOS = 2.5 for well-established soil parameters. For seismic conditions, FOS may be reduced to 2.0 per IS 1893.
How is net SBC different from safe bearing capacity?
Net SBC = qnet,ult/FOS — this is the pressure that can be applied in excess of the original overburden pressure. Safe BC = Net SBC + γDf — this is the total pressure the soil can bear including re-applied overburden. In practice, structural load per unit area is compared to Net SBC (since the soil was already supporting its own weight before excavation).